AMD EPYC offers up to 96 cores (Zen 4) and up to 192 cores (Zen 5), while Intel Xeon Sapphire Rapids provides up to 60 cores, favoring AMD for parallel workloads
AMD EPYC supports a six-channel memory design with higher memory bandwidth, while Intel Xeon supports up to 8TB of DDR5 memory for scalability
AMD EPYC excels in multi-threaded tasks like machine learning and simulations, while Intel Xeon outperforms in single-threaded tasks like high-frequency trading
AMD EPYC CPUs are more power-efficient with lower Thermal Design Power (TDP), while Intel Xeon CPUs consume more energy and generate more heat
AMD EPYC CPUs generally offer better performance per dollar, with additional cores making them cost-effective for parallel applications
AMD EPYC supports up to 128 PCIe 5.0 lanes and Infinity Fabric Link, while Intel Xeon features PCIe 5.0 and CXL for efficient resource sharing
AMD EPYC CPUs generally offer better performance per dollar, with additional cores making them cost-effective for parallel applications
AMD EPYC CPUs generally offer better performance per dollar, with additional cores making them cost-effective for parallel applications
AMD EPYC excels in multi-threaded tasks like machine learning and simulations, while Intel Xeon outperforms in single-threaded tasks like high-frequency trading
AMD EPYC supports a six-channel memory design with higher memory bandwidth, while Intel Xeon supports up to 8TB of DDR5 memory for scalability